|
New Plan Favors Nuke Testing in Nevada |
|
"Plan A" was production of new nuclear weapons in Nevada. Now, however, a
federal agency has shifted gears, deciding the best use of the Nevada Test Site
would be so-called "High Hazard" weapons testing, which includes nuclear
weapons. The site is located just 65 miles from Las Vegas, and Launce Rake of
the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada (PLAN) says
that's a little too close for comfort.
Public News Service: PLAN's Launce Rake says the government needs to shut down environmentally hazardous activities at the Nevada Test Site.
Las Vegas, NV – "Plan A" was production of new nuclear weapons in
Nevada. Now, however, a federal agency has shifted gears, deciding the best use
of the Nevada Test Site would be so-called "High Hazard" weapons testing, which
includes nuclear weapons. The site is located just 65 miles from Las Vegas, and
Launce Rake of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada (PLAN) says that's a little too close for comfort.
"It's simply not a
very prudent thing to do when you've got a population of two million here in Las
Vegas. Not only do we not need these weapons, but it will be unsafe and dirty
for the urban area."
The National Nuclear Safety Administration says
moving nuclear testing to smaller sites such as Nevada's will be safer, more
secure and less expensive. Rake argues the nation already has a nuclear arsenal
sufficient to blow up the world several times over; he suggests it looks more
like a 'sweetheart deal' for government contractors.
The Nevada Test site
also sits on ground sacred to Native Americans. Julie Ann Fishel with the Western Shoshone Defense Fund says it appeared the feds were
going to throw in the towel on the idea of using the old test site, but the
project somehow keeps coming back to life -- with little input from Native
Americans.
"I think this is just further evidence of the U.S.'s ongoing
violations against, not only Western Shoshone people, but the general public as
well. The ongoing environmental contamination and threats to people's physical
and environmental health and safety should be of extreme concern to
people."
In the Bush Administration's view, the plan will cut the size
and cost of the nation's nuclear weapons stock, but some scientists oppose the
idea because it effectively revives U.S. production of nuclear weapons. Fishel
says members of her Defense Project just testified about U.S. treaty violations
at a hearing in Switzerland. Had they known about this latest proposal, she
says, they would have lodged a complaint.
More information is available
online at
www.nnsa.doe.gov/complextransformation.htm.
Michael Clifford/Chris Thomas, Public News Service - NV
See original story here. |