Groups file suit seeking limits on growth
A coalition of groups advocating controlled growth has filed a lawsuit in Washoe District Court seeking to overturn Reno's designation of 29,000 acres north of Reno in its annexation area as a "special planning area" under its master plan.

Reno Gazette-Journal: PLAN Executive Director Bob Fulkerson says Reno needs real planning, not a "scheme" to grease leapfrog development.

 

SUSAN VOYLES

A coalition of groups advocating controlled growth has filed a lawsuit in Washoe District Court seeking to overturn Reno's designation of

29,000 acres north of Reno in its annexation area as a "special planning area" under its master plan.

The lawsuit filed Monday seeks to overturn the Regional Planning Commission's decision Feb. 13 that the "special planning area" designation complies with the regional plan. Plaintiffs are Rancho Haven Residents for Sensible Planning, Rancho resident Sandy McGill, activist Erik Holland, the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, Citizens for Cold Springs and Cold Springs resident Frank Schenk.

"It's not like planning. It's a scheme," said Bob Fulkerson, PLAN executive director. "We want them to go back to the drawing board."

Rosanna Coombes, Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency executive director, said she couldn't comment until she reads the case and consults with the agency's attorney.

During county commission discussion Tuesday night, Coombes described the special planning area.

"The SPA is not the end of the road," she said. "It's the beginning of the planning process."

John Hester, Reno community development director, could not be reached for comment. Marilyn Craig, assistant deputy district attorney for planning, declined to comment.

Hester has said the special planning area designation was sought because it would allow for Planned Unit Development handbooks, usually used for large master-planned projects with mixed uses.

Commissioner Jim Galloway wanted the commission to intervene because he considers the planning area is too broad.

In the residents' lawsuit, Reno lawyer John Marshall questions how Reno can exercise planning control over lands it cannot reasonably expect to annex. Reno and other municipalities asked the Nevada Legislature last year to clarify state law and give them the right to annex lands not touching their borders. Their bill was rejected.

Reno planners are reviewing plans for building 12,500 homes in Winnemucca Ranch even though it's 12 miles north from the city's nearest edge in Cold Springs.

Find original story here.